Pacific Northwest Digital Photography Community - Washington Oregon Idaho  

Go Back   PNW Digital Photography > Pacific Northwest Digital Photography > Camera Software

View Poll Results: Which is better, Aperture or Lightroom?
Apple Aperture 1 20.00%
Adobe Lightroom 1 20.00%
Other Software 1 20.00%
No Preference 2 40.00%
Voters: 5. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 03-03-2008, 12:56 AM   #1 (permalink)
Administrator
 
beansbaxter's Avatar
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 449
Blog Entries: 4

From: Seattle, WA

My Camera: Nikon D300

Which is better, Aperture or Lightroom?

I dont use either, but I will be adding a new Apple MacBook Pro to my aresenal so Aperture is now on the radar. I have Lightroom installed on my Vista machine, but it hardly ever gets used.

What do you use? What do you recommend between these two, or maybe you have another option?
__________________
“The camera’s only job is to get out of the way of making photographs.”
-- Ken Rockwell

beansbaxter.com is my blog.
 
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote

Old 03-05-2008, 03:19 AM   #2 (permalink)
Member
 
Motorcycle Man's Avatar
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 94

From: ...............

My Camera: Olympus Evolt E500

I have Aperture, but I haven't used it yet.
__________________
All images shot using Olympus E500 Evolt, 8mp, kit lenses.
 
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
Old 03-05-2008, 12:41 PM   #3 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 203

From: Seattle
Lightroom. I have used both. Lightroom is awesome. Particularly if you shoot RAW, like to take pics of the snow and have issues with white balance...
 
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
Old 03-06-2008, 10:58 AM   #4 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 203

From: Seattle
I should add that if anyone hasn't tried Lightroom they absolutely should. I'd say 95% of photographers could use it for 95% of their work, or all of it. All your photo edits are non-destructive (great for new peeps,) it's quicker and easy, processing RAWs is simple and you can save awesome presets.

I know a lot of pros who now use it exclusively. Try it.
 
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
Old 03-06-2008, 11:12 AM   #5 (permalink)
Junior Member
 
motorzen's Avatar
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 29

From: seattle
Quote:
Originally Posted by eric View Post
Lightroom. I have used both. Lightroom is awesome. Particularly if you shoot RAW, like to take pics of the snow and have issues with white balance...
Have you used Aperture 2.0? It's supposed be much better competition to Lightroom than the previous versions. Just curious.
 
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
Old 03-17-2008, 03:07 PM   #6 (permalink)
Member
 
SeattleVet's Avatar
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 80

From: Seattle

My Camera: Konica/Minolta Maxxum 7D

If you have a Mac, you at least have to try Aperture. They have a 30-day free trial (fully functional) available at the Apple web site. I downloaded it yesterday and did some stuff with it last night ... WOW!

I was going to update to iPhoto '08 and Photoshop Elements 6, but Aperture 2 does everything I normally need, all in one package, and *very* well integrated. Totally non-destructive editing (the original is never changed - just a work copy) and the speed (and memory usage) have been vastly improved over their original release. They also lowered the price from V1. I can see how this will help me cut some steps out of my usual workflow for sending photos for publication.

(The best part is that, as a gov't contractor, I can get it for something like $166. If you order through the Apple Online Store, go to the bottom of the first store page and see if you can qualify for any of the other 'stores' they have on the pulldown menu. They have fed and state/local government, education, etc., and the discounts can be very helpful. That's how I got my entire system a couple of years ago.)
__________________
--
WARNING: Do not look into laser beam with remaining eye!

You can see some of my images at http://seattlevet.smugmug.com

Last edited by SeattleVet; 03-17-2008 at 05:42 PM.
 
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
Old 05-09-2008, 06:16 PM   #7 (permalink)
Member
 
SeattleVet's Avatar
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 80

From: Seattle

My Camera: Konica/Minolta Maxxum 7D

OK, I've been using Aperture 2.1 for about 1.5 months now, so here's an update:

The more I use it, the more I like it. I can't make full use of the tethered mode, but it's easy enough to transfer from the card to a laptop if I want to see something a little bigger on location.

When I loaded my iPhoto library into Aperture everything came across perfectly. It has definitely cleaned up my workflow - it takes a fraction of the time it used to for me to go from shooting to burning the images to a CD to ship off, and has made my recordkeeping and image-tagging a lot easier, too, by letting me pre-select a set of keywords and EXIF data to tag the images with. You can search and sort on pretty much anything - it made putting together a set of photos for a mini 'gallery display' that I have hanging now very easy.

It's a big, complex program with a lot of power, but the ease of use makes it seem like it's a lesser program than it really is. The highlight recovery is amazing - in an image with blown-out highlights you can run a slider to bring back some detail. I have been very pleased with the results I have been getting using the various functions.

I have done NO spot-retouching or any other manipulation other than making sure the white balance, color, and exposures are right. It is amazingly fast (after working with Photoshop Elements in the past). From talking to others who have used Aperture 1.5, 2.0 (now 2.1) is a VERY good upgrade, much faster, and the new features alone were worth the price of the upgrade to them.

As I said above, they do have a 30-day free trial, so if you have a Mac give it a shot!

(Since I haven't used Lightroom I'm not voting in the poll as to which is 'better', as I have nothing to make a valid comparison... but I *really* like Aperture!)
__________________
--
WARNING: Do not look into laser beam with remaining eye!

You can see some of my images at http://seattlevet.smugmug.com
 
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
Reply

  PNW Digital Photography > Pacific Northwest Digital Photography > Camera Software

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 11:47 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.2.0 ©2008, Crawlability, Inc.
Copyright © 2008 PNW Digital Photography. All rights reserved.
Random Computers Bahai Forums PNW Riders Racing PNW Speed Sin City Sportbikes beansbaxter Emerald City Cycle PNW Digital Photography PNW Documentary PNW Riders PNWfx Media Group Pacific Northwest Biker Information Guide

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23