![]() |
|
|
#1 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Auburn, WA
Posts: 42
My Camera: Nikon D40
|
Photo blur
Same camera, same lens. I dunno WTF I did that the last two ended up blurry. Doesn't look quite like I jerked the shutter button to me but I dunno... not steady enough with the camera or...?
D40 55-200mm lens, hand held. Thoughts? (I can post the larger versions if that might help?)![]() ![]() ![]()
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Seattle
Posts: 385
|
What was your shutter speed? Were you all the way zoomed in?
__________________
TurkPhotos.com "Light makes photography. Embrace light. Admire it. Love it. But above all, know light. Know it for all you are worth, and you will know the key to photography." George Eastman |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Member
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Renton, WA
Posts: 86
My Camera: Canon 20D
|
i dont know about the second one, but the first looks like it's not shook or anything. on ur 100% crop, if you look at the pistils or whatever they're called, they look in focus and steady. looks like u just had your f-stop wide open, creating a real shallow focusing area
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Member
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Sammamish, WA
Posts: 63
My Camera: Canon 40D
|
Photoshop'ed the hell out of them to make the red flower stand out?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 | ||
|
Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Auburn, WA
Posts: 42
My Camera: Nikon D40
|
IIRC it was 100% zoomed in... but so were those first two.
I'll pull the shutter speed from the EXIF and post that. Don't remember ATM.Quote:
Quote:
__________________
Last edited by Nathan V; 04-28-2009 at 11:27 AM. |
||
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: everett
Posts: 75
|
Can see some ghosting on the edges of the flowers in 1, 3, and 4, which says there might have been some camera movement.
For 2, what was your focus distance? Maybe the lens couldn't focus that close? |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Auburn, WA
Posts: 42
My Camera: Nikon D40
|
Quote:
![]() The ghosting in 3 and 4 are my concern. I suppose just lower shutter speeds and a not perfectly steady hand could have been the cause...
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Pooptown
Posts: 375
My Camera: one pixel of awesome
|
if you're trying to do close-ups/macro with a lens that doesn't want to do it, it can be difficult. in my experience (and on a million review sites), zooming in all the way and being at the minimum focusing distance creates crap results cause generally speaking, the max and min zoom range are adequate at best on almost all lenses but have way better results in the middle range. which is why i bought a prime macro.
and haven't used it in 10 months. would have been cool to get the wasp in focus in the last one, though. |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: everett
Posts: 75
|
Quote:
I think for 2, it's not too easy to manually get a sharp focus without the built-in sharpness indicators (I'm forgetting my terminology here). Were you using the view finder or live view? If you're having problems, trying setting the focus point to the center only. If the camera still won't focus, it says there's not enough light or you're too close to the focus point. For a lens like that the minimum focus distance is probably 3-4 feet. Next time, try playing around a bit and then zoom in on your images to check for sharpness. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Auburn, WA
Posts: 42
My Camera: Nikon D40
|
I don't think the D40 has that option..? I was using the viewfinder. :(
__________________
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|